http://www.greedytriallawyer.com/

Recent Entries

  • Text Size: A A
Greedy Trial Lawyer

Corruption Of Science And Medicine...By The NEJM?

May 28, 2007

By Greedy Trial Lawyer

Comments (0)

TrackBack (0)

Category: Seeing Clearly Now

Over at Notes From Dr. RW we are told that discussions of science are corrupted when played out in the arena of public debate.

Tabloid based medicine trumps evidence based medicine

Mere moments following NEJM's release of the Avandia meta-analysis and editorial there were millions of Google search queries for Avandia according to a recent post from Clinical Cases and Images. Malpractice attorney ads began appearing only hours later. Hype spreads more rapidly than nuanced critical analysis. So, long before defects in the paper had a chance to be exposed, the popular media, consumer activists and the trial lawyers had taken over the debate. Within hours Avandia was the new Vioxx. More recently we have learned that the ongoing prospective RECORD trial, designed to look at macrovascular outcomes in patients taking Avandia, is in jeopardy (hat tip to Kevin M.D.) due to patients dropping out as a result of the publicity. Something's terribly wrong with this picture.

Some are accusing NEJM as being like a tabloid and PharmaGossip proposes a new cover style. Is NEJM deserving of the tabloid label? In my considered opinion, yes, for two reasons. First, the journal could have published a more critical, less inflammatory editorial. Even worse was the journal's decision for early open access release of the paper and editorial. Such a tactic might be appropriate for a public health emergency such as the SARS outbreak. This is not SARS. This is not a public health emergency.

Clearly tabloid based medicine has trumped evidence based medicine and done much harm. I have repeatedly argued that discussions of science are corrupted when played out in the arena of public debate. The Avandia controversy is a case in point.

Dr. RW has a valid point. I am sick and tired of all this gibberish about medicine clogging up the media. What this country needs is a separation of scientific discourse (including medicine) from the public. What possible good comes from public awareness and discussion of scientific matters? We should ban any scientific thought and discourse by anyone without a Dr. before his name. And, a similar ban should be applied to legal thought and communications. Ditto, in the areas of military matters and our government. Our lives would be so much better without all the corruption to medicine, science, law, military and government.

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.greedytriallawyer.com/admin/mt-tb.cgi/508

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?


Email Article



(optional):